Actually, quantization might refer to different yet related concepts, depending on whom you ask and which level of understanding you assume. So we’ll start with the most tangible one, the notion of physical quanta as particles. Next, we continue on a little more abstract level with the quantization of physical quantities such as energy, and finally, we’ll have a glimpse at the process of canonical quantization. Let’s dive in!

a) The Notion of Particles

Quantum physics is the science of atomic and sub-atomic particles at about the length scale of one-millionth of a hair’s diameter. While some of these particles are formed by smaller, more fundamental particles, like a proton is made up of quarks, some of these particles are – to the best of our current knowledge – non-divisible and thus constitute the quanta of matter: the smallest, indivisible building blocks of our universe, such as quarks, electrons or photons.

On this level, quantization means that matter and light only come in certain portions and that larger portions are always a multiple of these single portions. Think about a laser beam consisting of $n$ photons. From Einstein’s explanation of the photoelectric effect, we know that a single photon has an energy $E$ proportional to its frequency $f$ by $E = h \cdot f$. And the entire beam will have an energy of $E_{\mathrm{tot}} = n \cdot h \cdot f$

So the energy of this laser beam is quantized, as only multiples of a single photons’ energy will occur, never one half of it and neither twenty-three thirds. It basically the same as the quantization of paper money, there is a banknote for one dollar, five dollars, or ten dollars, but there are no three-dollar banknotes.

b) Quanta of Physical Variables

We are now going one step further and assume you have heard about the existence of Schrödinger equation:

$$\hat{H} \, \psi(x) = E \cdot \psi(x)$$

In the previous section, the energy of that laser beam was quantized because the beam itself consisted of a discrete number of particles. Yet the energy of a single photon could take any value, only depending on its frequency, and that was the case because these photons were free particles, i.e. they were free to float around in space going anywhere.

But what if we now consider a particle of mass $m$ being subject to a potential $V(\vec{r})$, e.g., placed inside a finite potential well? If the particle’s energy is greater than the potential well’s depth $V_0$, we get scattering states, and the particle’s energy still can assume any value: we get a continuous energy spectrum.

The whole story changes if our particle has less energy and is bound by the potential. In order to figure out, what is the particle’s energy you would a) solve Schrödinger’s equation:

$$\hat{H} \, \psi = \left( \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + V \right) \psi(x) = E \cdot \psi(x)$$

and b) take into account the boundary conditions the particle’s wave function needs to fulfill when hitting the well’s boundary. But the point is that these boundary conditions can only be fulfilled for certain discrete energies.

The example gets more memorable once you consider an infinite potential well, where the particle’s wave function has to assume exactly zero value at the well’s boundary and beyond. (That well is infinitely high, so the particle can’t be at the well’s boundary or even go beyond – quantum tunneling is only possible for potential barriers of finite extent).

The boundary conditions for the wave function are analogous to the string of a guitar being fixed at both ends and thus having standing waves as its eigenmodes. Only modes that leave both ends fixed comply with the boundary conditions and thus occur as eigenmodes or particle wave functions. And therefore, only the energy of those modes will pop up in the energy spectrum, forming a set of discrete energy values.

A similar story can be told about the energy levels of a hydrogen atom: In the simplest, semi-classical picture, an ‘electron wave’ given the De Broglie wavelength $\lambda = \frac{h}{p}$ is orbiting the core proton. As the electron wave goes around, it eventually reaches the starting point of its motion, beginning to interfere with itself. Thus, only those electron waves survive, which form standing waves, i.e., whose orbits cover a multiple of the De Broglie wavelength. And only the energy of those electron waves will show up as discrete energy levels in the energy spectrum.

So it’s all about boundary conditions. If a potential constrains a particle’s motion, it will feature discrete energy levels. Besides that, other quantities such as spin, angular momentum, or parity can also be quantized. It is characteristic of quantum mechanics that physical quantities assume under some circumstances only discrete values or be a multiple of some smallest, indivisible quantum portion.

c) Canonical Quantization

Finally, we are going one more step further and assume you have heard about quantum mechanical operators, which we will label by a hat, like $\hat{p}$ for the momentum operator. In quantum mechanics, physical observables such as position, momentum, or energy are described by Hermitian operators. Their eigenvalues constitute possible measurement results of the respective observable, and the absolute value squared of their eigenstates tells us about the likelihood that the corresponding eigenvalue is measured.

On an abstract level, quantization now refers to the process of canonical quantization, i.e., making the transition from classical physics to quantum physics. Or, more specifically, constructing a quantum (field) theory out of a classical theory by replacing classical variables like position $x$ or momentum $p$ with quantum mechanical operators $\hat{x}$ or $\hat{p}$, while keeping the formal structure of the theory. So what does ‘keeping the formal structure’ mean?

In classical physics, a system is governed by a Hamiltonian $H(q,p)$, which depends on the position $q$ and the canonical momentum $p$. The relation between these two quantities is manifested by the so-called Poisson bracket

$$\left\{ A, B \right\} = \frac{\partial A}{\partial q} \frac{\partial B}{\partial p} – \frac{\partial A}{\partial p} \frac{\partial q}{\partial q}$$

capturing the canonical (also called symplectic) structure of the theory by ${q, p} = 1$. ‘Preserving the structure’ now means, that in analogy to the Poisson bracket one introduces the so-called commutator for quantum operators $\hat{A}, \hat{B}$

$$\left[ \hat{A}, \hat{B} \right] = \hat{A} \hat{B} – \hat{B} \hat{A}$$

which checks if you are allowed to interchange these two operators. If so, i.e. $\hat{A} \hat{B} = \hat{B} \hat{A}$, the commutator assumes a value of zero. This has major implications for the relation between the two operators $\hat{A}, \hat{B}$ representing physical observables, for example that measuring the value of $\hat{A}$ does not influence the measurement of the value of $\hat{B}$.

Vice versa, a non-zero commutator implies that these two operators may not be interchanged, which is the case, for example, for the position-momentum-commutator

$$\left[ \hat{x}, \hat{p} \right] = i \hbar$$

This tells us that position and momentum of a particle cannot be measured exactly simultaneously (the measurement of either influences the measurement of the other) as expressed by Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation.

To cut a long story short: Canonical quantization is the process of going from classical physics to quantum physics by replacing classical variables (i.e., numbers) with operators (i.e., linear mappings) and Poisson brackets with commutators:

$$x \to \hat{x}, \quad p \to \hat{p}$$

$${x,p} = 1 \to \frac{1}{i \hbar}[\hat{x},\hat{p}] = 1$$

This reproduces the familiar canonical structure of classical mechanics and allows for describing all those quantum mechanics effects. However, this mapping is not unique in the sense that not all combinations of $x$ and $p$ can be mapped exactly to their quantum analogs (you get problems for polynomials of degree four and higher), and also the way this mapping is performed in detail can be chosen according to different ‘quantization schemes.’ While quantization usually refers to canonical quantization, there are also alternative approaches such as path integral quantization and more exotic ones.

TL;DR

Quantization might refer to something coming in fundamental, indivisible portions, like a particle or a discrete energy spectrum, or the process of going from classical physics to quantum physics called canonical quantization.